Case Documents

View Attached Documents

Take Action

TAKE ACTION: Tell the DOJ to Prosecute U.S. Government officials responsible for Torture

The long-awaited Senate torture report proves that after 9/11 the CIA engaged in a sophisticated…

Related Cases

What's New

Solitary Confinement Class Action Should Cover Prisoners Moved from Pelican Bay, Attorneys Argue

February 12, 2015, Oakland – Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) urged a federal…

Center for Constitutional Rights Condemns Placement of Rasmea Odeh in Solitary Confinement

December 5, 2014, New York – In response to reports that Palestinian-American activist Rasmea Odeh…

Related Resources

Detention Watch Network (DWN) v. Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE)

Print Friendly and PDF


In November of 2013, the Detention Watch Network (DWN) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agencies for information pertaining to the so-called "detention bed quota," also known as the "detention bed mandate" or "lockup quota."


On July 3, 2014 the Court issued a new Order regarding the number of pages ICE and DHS must review and produce on a monthly basis going forward.


Since 2009, appropriations bills passed by the U.S. Congress have required 34,000 immigration detention beds be filled at all times, though the use of local jails and correctional facilities, as well as private correctional facilities. This detention of undocumented individuals is a matter of concern to DWN, CCR and the affected communities nationwide. The suggestion in recent news articles that the quota is not welcomed by high-level Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) officials such as former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano,  but is the result of private prison corporations lobbying certain members of the Senate and House DHS appropriations subcommittees, raises questions regarding fiscal responsibility and appropriations priorities.

The public has a right to understand the motives of government officials and agencies regarding this important policy issue, which devastates families and immigrant communitiesespecially in light of the upcoming appropriations and continued Comprehensive Immigration Reform debate. The request hopes to obtain information that gives the public a better understanding of the detention bed quota, the decision-making surrounding the quota, and its impact on detention policy and detention contracting decisions. This information will enable the public, advocates and policy-makers to engage in an important on-going policy debate.


On November 25, 2013, CCR and DWN filed their FOIA request with DHS and ICE.

On January 30, 2014, CCR and DWN filed their FOIA complaint in the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

On February 11, 2014, CCR and DWN filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

On March 5, 2014, Defendants responded to our Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

On March 5, 2014, Defendant DHS filed a Motion to Dismiss.

On March 17, 2014, Plaintiffs filed our Reply to Defendants' Opposition.

On March 28, 2014, Plaintiffs filed our Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

On April 7, 2014, Defendants withdrew their Motion to Dismiss.

On May 13, 2014, parties appeared before Judge Lorna Schofield.

On May 16, 2014, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice and setting a schedule for Defendants to produce documents on a rolling basis.

On June 18, 2014 CCR wrote to the Court regarding the inadequacy of the documents produced by the Government on June 16, 2014 and requesting immediate production of additional documents.

On July 3, 2014 the Court issued a new Order regarding the number of pages ICE and DHS must review and produce on a monthly basis going forward.


FOIA Request and Complaint

Court Orders

February 11, 2014 Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (2/11/14)

Defendants' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction (3/5/14)

Plaintiffs' Reply (3/17/14)

March 5, 2014 Defendant DHS's Motion to Dismiss

DHS Motion to Dismiss (3/5/14)

Plaintiffs' Opposition to DHS Motion to Dismiss (3/28/14)

Plaintiffs' Letter to Court Regardin Inadequacy of Government's June 16, 2014 Production (6/18/14)